Twitter Updates
Years
Genres
Latest Threads
Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)
by
kingelite,
13 minutes ago
I love the prequels to the star trek. But the next cast pretty much suck from generations to nemesis.
Heroes (2006)
by
lunabella,
35 minutes ago
I Know it Really sucked they canceled it..:(
It was an Awesome Show!!!!! :)
Elementary (2012)
by
msredqueen,
1 hour ago
Sherlock is coming back. I like it better as well. This is ok, but miss the other, as well.
Flyboys (2006)
by
hettytheband,
2 hours ago
7.5/10...
Putting in a vote for the Carolina music awards???...Write in "Hetty" hettytheband@gmail...Just because it would be funny....carolinamusicawards.com/cma/vote/
Vice (2013)
by
Dubious,
2 hours ago
Great series, I've polished off all 7 episodes so far. The "ishared.eu" links seem to work quite well, loading rather quickly. The show itself is quite insightful and crams a lot of stuff into a small amount of time (8-14 minutes per segment), which can be seen as either a good or a bad thing. Although it feels to me like each episode would be better if it was extended, the short lengths can hold nearly anybodies attention span.
Daleks' Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D. (1966)
by
ByteMyAss,
2 hours ago
Based from the BBC TV series: "Doctor Who" (1966)
Dr. Who and his companions arrive on Earth in the year 2150 AD, only to discover the planet has been invaded and enslaved by the dreaded...
The Americanization of Emily (1964)
by
solitus,
3 hours ago
A charming and funny movie, I'm surprised there are no links. Sometimes, It's nice to just watch a story without excessive Drama, Action, or Special Effects.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012)
by
moviegirl1234,
3 hours ago
@jackob125; Hmmm...Well, first and foremost, I appreciate your comment and taking the time to share your opinion. People are unique and have different opinions, and that is what makes for lively discussion. I personally disagree. If they can make 7 Fast and Furious films (!!??#*%*$), 9 Nightmare on Elm Streets, and 23 James Bond films, I don't see how anyone could have a problem with breaking a classic and beloved book into three gorgeous films. Even if it could have been completed in two, why does it matter? The way Peter Jackson directs is magic, and no scene is superfluous. I do agree that the LOTR trilogy was epic, and I'm not sure yet if The Hobbit will be able to rise to the level of that tale. We shall see.